LENEXA, KS ·
OSHA Inspection: AEROMOTIVE, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AEROMOTIVE, INC. in 7805 BARTON STREET, LENEXA, KS 66214 (NAICS 336390). OSHA activity number 339540239.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AEROMOTIVE, INC.
- Site address
- 7805 BARTON STREET
- City
- LENEXA
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66214
- Mailing
- 7805 BARTON STREET, LENEXA, KS 66214
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336390
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- May 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $1,428 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: Employee(s) changing out propane tanks on industrial fork trucks were exposed to physical injuries due to no personal protective equipment being worn such as chemical goggles, chemical aprons, safety glasses, and etc., to prevent inadvertent contact with propane.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1428
- · Z (S) $2040
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- May 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): A personal protective equipment assessment was not performed for each job position to determine the types of personal protective equipment needed, such as, but not limited to employee(s) changing propane tanks on powered industrial trucks were exposed to struck by hazards due to no personal protection equipment hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- May 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks: Employee(s) operating the Datsun powered industrial fork truck to move materials and product around at the facility were exposed to struck-by hazards due to no powered industrial truck training being performed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $952
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Feb 10, 2014
- Abate by
- May 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review: At the establishment a written emergency action plan had not been developed and implemented to instruct employee(s) of the action necessary when carrying out an immediate evacuation due to fire.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336390)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339540239.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.