Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SCHLOTTERBECK & FOSS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCHLOTTERBECK & FOSS in 117 PREBLE STREET, PORTLAND, ME 04103 (NAICS 311941). OSHA activity number 339541815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Schlotterbeck & Foss — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Schlotterbeck & Foss is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
117 PREBLE STREET
City
PORTLAND
State
ME
ZIP
04103
Mailing
117 PREBLE STREET, PORTLAND, ME 04103
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311941
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2014
Abate by
Mar 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employees from the hazard(s):     At the Facility - The employer did not provide nor require employees to use personal protective equipment for those instances when employees could come into contact with steam pipes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1904.7 B04

Other-than-serious 3 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Jan 22, 2014
Abate by
Jan 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $490 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.      At the Facility - The employer did not enter correctly the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2013:       a)    On 7/30/2013, an employee received a chemical burn.  He lost 4 days of work. The OSHA 300 log did not indicate he had lost any time nor was column H checked.       b)    On 10/4/2013, and employee felt something in his back "pop".  This resulted in 6 days of restricted work.  The OSHA 300 log did not indicate he had received any restricted time nor was column I checked.       c)    On 12/5/2013, and employee fell form a chair and hit her head.  This resulted in 11 days away form work.  The l11days was not recorded on the OSHA 300 log nor was the incident included in the totals for column H.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

View Schlotterbeck & Foss's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339541815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.