Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ABENAKI TIMBER CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ABENAKI TIMBER CORPORATION in 361 PLEASANT STREET, EPPING, NH 03042 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 339545253.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Abenaki Timber Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Abenaki Timber Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
361 PLEASANT STREET
City
EPPING
State
NH
ZIP
03042
Mailing
P. O. BOX 699, KINGSTON, NH 03848
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423310
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Aisles and passageways were not kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the passageway leading to an exit was blocked by a large steel beam in the green line building.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1400
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.23 A09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(9): Every floor hole into which persons cannot accidentally walk (on account of fixed machinery, equipment, or walls) were not protected by a cover that leaves no openings more than one inch wide:  a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the 22" x 11" floor opening on the second story of the boiler building was not guarded or covered.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.23 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(1): Every wall opening from which there is a drop of more than 4 feet was not guarded:  Instance a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the wall opening on the second floor level of the boiler building was not guarded to prevent falls of over 7 feet.  Instance b. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the loading dock areas in the stacker building were not guarded to prevent falls of over 4 feet 10 inches.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(2): Exit routes were not arranged so that employees would not have to travel toward a high hazard area, nor was the hazard effectively shielded by suitable partitions or barriers:  a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, flammable liquids were stored in the emergency exit aisle way.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.37 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the exit door signage in the planer building was damaged and not maintained.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, eye protection was not utilized by employees performing pneumatic winterizing painting activities.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1050
  • · C (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.147 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3): When servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department or other group,  the employer did not ensure that employee(s) utilized a procedure which affords the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, each employees was not utilizing a personal locking device while performing group lockout tag out procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.335 A01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, employees performing electrical diagnostics testing were not provided with body protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(v): Employees exposed to the danger of injury to the eyes or face from electric arcs or flashes or from flying objects resulting from electrical explosion did not wear protective equipment for the eyes or face:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, employees performing electrical diagnostic testing were not provided with eye and face protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)    Instance a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that each employee assigned to operate the Toyota (model # 6FDUAOFSUA410. S/N6FD60124) forklift was trained in its use.    Instance b. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that each employee assigned to operate the Taylor (model # THD300S. S/N 28140) forklift was trained in its use.    Instance c. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that each employee assigned to operate the Taylor (model # THD300M. S/NS-T428889) forklift was trained in its use.     Instance b. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that each employee assigned to operate the Linde (model # H45D-04 S/N H2X352N0105745) forklift was trained in its use.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazards created by in-going nip points, rotating parts, and/or flying chips and sparks:    Instance a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the dry line conveyor belt was not guarded at the in-going nip point.     Instance b. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the rotating rubber tires on the dry line conveyor belt were not guarded.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.219 C02 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    Instance a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the Sanborn horizontal shafts were not guarded in the dry line building.     Instance b. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the Sanborn horizontal shafts were not guarded in the green line building.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the projecting 3 inch shaft end on the stacker machine was not guarded.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.219 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1): Gear(s) were not guarded by a complete enclosure or by one of the methods specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(ii) and (f)(1)(iii):    a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the Sanborn machine's sprocket wheel and chain were not guarded in the green line building.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Offhand grinding machines did not have a work rest to support the work and/or was not kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest:   a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the Sears Craftsman 6 inch bench grinder was missing the tool rest on the right-hand side grinding wheel.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2014
Abate by
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:  a. Site - On or about January 14, 2014, the maintenance garage main electrical panel was blocked and not made accessible during emergency or maintenance events.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Abenaki Timber Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339545253.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.