ORLANDO, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: ALL COUNTY RECYCLING & SHREDDING OF ORLANDO, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ALL COUNTY RECYCLING & SHREDDING OF ORLANDO, LLC in 1625 WEST PRINCETON ST, ORLANDO, FL 32804 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 339546988.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALL COUNTY RECYCLING & SHREDDING OF ORLANDO, LLC
- Site address
- 1625 WEST PRINCETON ST
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32804
- Mailing
- 1625 WEST PRINCETON ST, ORLANDO, FL 32804
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to caught in and/or fall hazards: a. Baler area - employees were required to stand on the moving Karl W Schmidt & Associates conveyor belt during processing operations. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. Processing - the employer did not ensure powered industrial truck training for employees that operated Utilev UT52P 7242H10100F forklift. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14. b. Processing - the employer did not ensure powered industrial truck training for employees that operated CAT 262C MST03404 forklift. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. Processing area - the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, oxygen, acetylene, grease, propane, hydraulic oil. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a. Processing area - the oil tote near propane storage was not labeled. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: a. Processing area - the employer did not have material safety data sheets for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, oxygen, acetylene, grease, propane, hydraulic oil. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. Processing - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to, oxygen, acetylene, grease, propane, hydraulic oil. Violation observed on or about 1/14/14.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339546988.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.