WACO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: VANTRAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VANTRAN INDUSTRIES, INC. in 7711 IMPERIAL DRIVE, WACO, TX 76702 (NAICS 335311). OSHA activity number 339551319.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VANTRAN INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 7711 IMPERIAL DRIVE
- City
- WACO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76702
- Mailing
- 7711 IMPERIAL DRIVE, WACO, TX 76702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335311
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that, employees were exposed to, struck by and crush by hazards from loads being raised by hoist and lifting devices: On or about January 13, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that all hoist, hooks, chains, and below the hook lifting devices were frequently inspected, tested, and rated in the following locations: 1) Buffing Department Hoist #11 Dayton 2 Ton 2) Winding Department Hoist #16 Coffing 2 Ton 3) Winding Department Hoist #12 Jet 2 Ton 4) High Bay Crane #1 Yale 10 Ton 5) High Bay Crane #2 Coffing 10 Ton 6) Shear Area Hoist #9 Dayton 2 Ton 7) Radiator Seaming Area Hoist #18 Harrington 3 Ton 8) Radiator Seaming Area Hoist #19 Harrington 3 Ton 9) Marks Welding Area Hoist #21 Dayton 2 Ton 10) Jasons Area Hoist #20 Dayton 2 Ton 11) Shear Area Hoist #9 Dayton 2 Ton attached to Vacuum Lifter Safety Latch was tied back using a Zip Tie. 12) In the Winding Department , the Coffing 2 Ton Hoist used a spreader bar that was not labeled, rated or inspected. 13) In the Winding Department, the Jet 2 Ton Hoist used a spreader bar that was not labeled, rated, or inspected. 14) High Bay Crane #1 the Yale 10 Ton Crane used a spreader bar that was not labeled, rated, or inspected. 15) High Bay Crane #2 the Coffing 10 Ton Crane used a spreader bar that was not labeled, rated, or inspected. 16) High Bay Crane #2 the Coffing 10 Ton Crane used a dual spreader bar that was not labeled, rated, or inspected.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.213 C03
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs designed to provide adequate holding power for all thicknesses of materials being cut: On or about January 13, 2014, and times prior thereto, in the Winding Department, the employer did not ensure that the Align a RIP XRC 10 inch table saw non kickback fingers functioned exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: On or about January 13, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that the Jet Bench Grinder, Model JBG-8A S/N 12092742 work rest was kept adjusted closely to the wheel to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.243 C03
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel: On or about January 13, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure portable grinders were equipped with safety guards. The employees were exposed to flying debris or struck by hazards during use. 1) Dewalt Grinder - Welding Area 2) Makita Grinder - Welding Area
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Jun 26, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: On or about January 13, 2014, the employer used flexible cords in lieu of permanent wiring to supply electrical power to the lights and electrical outlets exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
More inspections at Vantran Industries, INC.
View Vantran Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335311)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339551319.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.