Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GLF CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of GLF CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 23485 US 98 WEST, LAMONT, FL 32336 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 339553356.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GLF Construction Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GLF Construction Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23485 US 98 WEST
City
LAMONT
State
FL
ZIP
32336
Mailing
80 SOUTH WEST 8TH STREET, MIAMI, FL 33130
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by/crush hazard:  a.  On or about January 16, 2014, employees did not secure and dismantle the Acrow Bridge panels according to the procedure set in place by GLF management, exposing themselves to a struck by/crush hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.251 C16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(16): Wire rope slings did not have permanently affixed, legible identification markings stating size, rated capacity for the type(s) of hitch(es) used and the angle upon it is based, and the number of legs if more than one:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the American crane was using a wire rope that did not have tags, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.251 E08

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(8): Synthetic web slings were not immediately removed from service if any of the following conditions specified in 1926.251(e)(8)(i) through (e)(8)(v) were present:  (i) Acid or caustic burns; (ii) Melting or charring of any part of the sling surface; (iii) snags, punctures, tears, or cuts; (iv) broken or worn stitches; or (v) distortion of fittings:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the American 5299 crane was using synthetic slings that had snags, punctures, tears, and cuts, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.       b.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the JCB 512-56 Forklift was using synthetic slings that had snags, punctures, tears, and cuts, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1926.106 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.106(d): At least one lifesaving skiff was not immediately available at locations where employees were working over or adjacent to water:   a.  On or about January 16, 2014, employees working over and near the Aucilla River did not have a skiff immediately available, exposing employees to the hazard of drowning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the trestle, employees working near the edge were not protected from a 7 1/2 to 9 1/2 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.501 B04 II

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface was not protected from tripping in or stepping into or through holes (including skylights) by covers:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, employees were working/walking on the trestle that had floor holes from 1 to 3 feet wide, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.251 C04 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(c)(4)(iv): Wire rope shall not be used if, in any length of eight diameters, the total number of visible broken wires exceeds 10 percent of the total number of wires, or if the rope shows other signs of excessive wear, corrosion, or defect:  a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, a forklift was using a wire rope that had three broken strands and other defective strands to lift Acrow Bridge panels, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $7,000
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval:    a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, employees had made additions to the JCB 512-56 Forklift without the manufacturer's prior written approval.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, employees were climbing on top of the crane mats in order to dismantle them, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.       b.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the west side of the bridge, employees were stepping down off of the trestle, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1926.1052 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $5,000
29 CFR 1926.1052(a)(1): Stairways that would not be a permanent part of the structure on which construction work was being performed did not have landings of not less that 30 inches (76 cm) in the direction of travel and extend at least 22 inches:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the west side of the Acrow Bridge, the stairs leading to the trestle did not have the correct landing, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $4000

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the west side of the Acrow Bridge, the stairs leading to the trestle did not have a stair rail system, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1415 A01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1415(a)(1)(i): The equipment did not have a crane level indicator that is either built into the equipment or was available on the equipment:   a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the crane operator was operating a crane without a level, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.1424 A02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1424(a)(2)(i): Training was not conducted of each employee assigned to work on or near the equipment ("authorized personnel") in how to recognize struck-by and pinch/crush hazard areas posed by the rotating superstructure:   a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the employees working around the crane had not been trained how to recognize hazard areas posed by the rotating superstructure, exposing employees to struck-by, pinching, and crush hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.1425 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1425(c)(3): The materials were not rigged by a qualified rigger:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the employees rigging material for the crane were not qualified.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l), "AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d)":    a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, employees were operating a JCB 512-56 Forklift without being trained, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1926.1428 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 5, 2014
Abate by
Jul 1, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1428(a): The employer of the signal person did not ensure that each signal person meet the Qualification Requirements (paragraph (c) of this section) prior to giving any signals. This requirement must be met by using either Option (1) or Option (2) of this section:     a.  On or about January 16, 2014, on the east side of the bridge, the employees signaling the crane were not certified, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5000

View GLF Construction Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339553356.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.