Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JDS CONTRACTING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JDS CONTRACTING, LLC in 126 DUNE RD, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NY 11978 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339556573.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JDS Contracting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JDS Contracting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
126 DUNE RD
City
WESTHAMPTON BEACH
State
NY
ZIP
11978
Mailing
2 JEANNE COURT, HAMPTON BAYS, NY 11946
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Worksite - Employees were working under areas where objects such as, but not limited to, power/hand tools and roofing materials could potentially fall. Employees were not wearing hard hats; on, or about 01/09/2014.     Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  a) Worksite, interior - Employees engaged in work on a new residential home were using pneumatic nail guns for framing. Employees were not using eye protection; on, or about 01/09/2014.    b) Worksite, interior - Employees engaged in work on a new residential home were using hand-held circular saws for framing. Employees were not using eye protection; on, or about 01/09/2014.    Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.300 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.300(a): Hand tool(s), power tool(s) or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition:  a) Worksite, roof - The electrical cord, strain relief, for a hand-held circular saw was damaged, exposing employees to electrical wires; on, or about 01/09/2014.       Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe:  a) Worksite, roof - Employees were engaged in cutting wood material during framing of a residential home. Hand-held, circular saws used to cut material were used without the manufacturers safety cover/guard in position; on, or about 01/09/2014.       Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a) Worksite, Roof - Employees engaged in construction activities were observed working on the roof of a residential home, approximately 20 feet above the ground. Employees were not protected from falling, by guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems; on, or about, 01/15/2014.     Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) Worksite, roof - Employees engaged in construction activities were observed working on the roof of a residential home, approximately 20 feet above the ground. Employees were not trained to recognize associated hazards; on, or about, 01/15/2014.     Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Worksite, roof - Employees were accessing a roof at the heights of approximately 20 feet. The portable ladder used to access the roof extended approximately one foot above the upper landing surface; on, or about, 01/09/2014.   Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 9, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  a) Worksite, South - Employees were accessing a roof at the heights of approximately 20 feet. The portable ladder used to access the roof extended approximately one foot above the upper landing surface. Employee were not trained to recognize relative hazards; on, or about, 01/09/2014.  b) Worksite, Interior - Employees were using an a-frame ladder in the closed position. Employee were not trained to recognize relative hazards; on, or about, 01/09/2014.   Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certificationfor this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 28, 2014
Abate by
Jun 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used for the purpose for which they were designed.   a) Worksite, interior - An A-Frame ladder was set up and used in the closed position; on, or about, 01/09/2014.    Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View JDS Contracting, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339556573.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.