LEXINGTON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: ORION LEXINGTON, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ORION LEXINGTON, LLC in 250 DELEWARE, LEXINGTON, OH 44904 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339557357.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORION LEXINGTON, LLC
- Site address
- 250 DELEWARE
- City
- LEXINGTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44904
- Mailing
- 250 DELEWARE, LEXINGTON, OH 44904
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 95
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- May 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: On or about January 22, 2014, the employer did not assure employees who are exposed to electrical hazards while performing work on or near exposed energized parts were trained in electrical safety-related work practices. A maintenance employee was exposed to electrical hazards in that safe work practices were not employed to prevent electrical shock or other injuries when performing electrical tests. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1666
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.333 A
- Issued
- May 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized: On or about January 22, 2014, the employer did not develop and implement electrical safety related work practices which cover employees exposed to live electrical conductors while performing electrical work. Maintenance personnel responsible for troubleshooting and/or performing electrical tests were exposed to electrical hazards in that safe work practices were not employed to prevent electrical shock and or other injuries. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- May 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 18, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: On or about January 22, 2014, the employer did not assure that employees who troubleshoot electrical equipment are provided with and use personal protective equipment to protect from electrical hazards. A maintenance employee, using a multi-meter to troubleshoot an air compressor's 215 electrical system, was exposed to electrical shock and arc flash hazards in that insulated gloves with leather gloves, safety glasses, and a hard hat was not worn during the troubleshooting activities. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1666
- · Z (S) $2380
1910.1030 G02 VII N
- Issued
- May 6, 2014
- Abate by
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(N): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain an opportunity for interactive questions or answers with the person conducting the training session: The employer did not assure that employees with occupational exposure who received bloodborne pathogen training through a computer based program were provided with an opportunity for interactive questions and answers during the training session. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 6, 2014
- Abate by
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0435R271
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about January 22, 2014, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program that informed employees of chemical hazards such as Zep's commercial shower tub and tile cleaner (sulfamic acid, hydroxyacetic acid), Xtraction II carpet cleaner (2-Butoxyethanol), and Chemcor's lemon disinfectant (didecyldimethyl ammonium chloride) which may lead to respiratory irritation, skin and eye irritation and burns.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339557357.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.