Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN-SPRINGFIELD TOOLING & MOLDING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMERICAN-SPRINGFIELD TOOLING & MOLDING, INC. in 3550 MAYFLOWER SUITE A, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339558926.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch American-Springfield Tooling & Molding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American-Springfield Tooling & Molding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3550 MAYFLOWER SUITE A
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62711
Mailing
3550 MAYFLOWER SUITE A, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62711
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Sep 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):   The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  Employees were exposed to hazardous energy when performing setup, and service and maintenance tasks on the employers equipment and periodic inspections of each energy control procedure had not been conducted at least annually, during servicing and maintenance tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3):   All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):   Employees were exposed to the unexpected energization of equipment while performing mold changes on injection molding equipment and the employer did not ensure employees had isolated and locked out each energy source during this and other service and maintenance operations at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.147 D04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i):   Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:   Employees were exposed to the unexpected energization of equipment while performing mold changes on injection molding equipment and the employer did not ensure employees utilized lockout devices during this and other service and maintenance operations at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Employees working in areas where fork trucks were operating were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer failed to ensure that the fork truck operators were trained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Jun 20, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):   The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:  Employees working in areas where fork trucks were operating were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer failed to certify that the fork truck operators were trained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Sep 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii):     Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):     Employees were exposed to the unexpected energization of equipment while performing mold changes on injection molding equipment and the employer did not establish machine specific procedures that were specific enough to ensure that energy was controlled during this and other service and maintenance operations at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2014
Abate by
Sep 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i):     The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:      Employees were exposed to the hazard of contact with stored energy and adequate training, to provide the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of energy controls, was not provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

View American-Springfield Tooling & Molding, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339558926.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.