Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLORES FRAMING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FLORES FRAMING in 101A ST JOHN'S DRIVE, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL 32407 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339560955.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flores Framing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flores Framing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLORES FRAMING
Site address
101A ST JOHN'S DRIVE
City
PANAMA CITY BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32407
Mailing
11555 BISSONNET STREET #2005, HOUSTON, TX 77099
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a.  On or about January 13, 2014, an employee was using a Hitachi pneumatic nail gun without the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,840 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a.  On or about January 13, 2014, employees setting trusses were not protected from a 20 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1840
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):    a.  On or about January 13, 2014, on the interior east side of the building, the ladder used to access the 2nd floor was not angled correctly, exposing employees to a 10 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Flores Framing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339560955.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.