Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAGIC STONE GRANITE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MAGIC STONE GRANITE in 6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79925 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 339561086.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Magic Stone Granite — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Magic Stone Granite is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MAGIC STONE GRANITE
Site address
6821 MARKET AVE
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79925
Mailing
6821 MARKET AVE, EL PASO, TX 79925
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.243 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1): Abrasive wheel(s) were used on portable grinder(s) which were not provided with safety guard(s) meeting the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.243(c)(1) through (c)(4)(a).    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, employees were using portable grinders without safety guards in the grinding and polishing areas.  This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure.    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, a piece of an electrical flexible cord was connected to a receptacle, and used as substitute for fixed wiring at the grinding and polishing area, to power a fluorescent light fixture hung from the ceiling.  This condition exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap.    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, spliced flexible cord was used in the polishing and grinding area to provide electrical power to a fluorescent light.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket).    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, portable cords and flexible cords sets used in the grinding and polishing area are not visually inspected before use. This condition exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    on or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, employer has not performed workplace hazard assessment through a written certification of the workplace (Grinding and polishing areas).  This condition exposed employees to safety and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(iii): Employee(s) required to use personal protective equipment "PPE" by this section were not trained to know how to don, doff, adjust, and wear PPE.    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, employer did not trained employees how to properly wear N-95 respirators.  This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 26, 2014
Abate by
Aug 15, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program.    On or about January 24, 2014, and times prior thereto, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program.  This condition exposed employees to chemical and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339561086.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.