ORLANDO, FL —
OSHA Inspection: RCI CONSTRUCTION CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RCI CONSTRUCTION CO. in 7215 SOUTH JOHN YOUNG PKWY, ORLANDO, FL 32809 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339564528.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RCI CONSTRUCTION CO.
- Site address
- 7215 SOUTH JOHN YOUNG PKWY
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32809
- Mailing
- 2702 ALABASTER AVE, ORLANDO, FL 32833
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a. At the south west corner of the building, an employee was exposed to a 28 feet fall hazard while using a JLG 460 SJ aerial lift to gain access to the roof of the building without the use of a fall arrest system such as a full body harness or a body belt used as a restraint system attached to the basket Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a. At the south west corner of the building, an employee was installing metal framing at the entrance overhang 14 feet from the ground without any fall protection. b. At the south west corner of the building, an employee was exposed to a 28 feet fall hazard, in that, while on the roof no fall protection was used when handling material used for metal framing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339564528.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.