Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: EMILO GUZMAN

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of EMILO GUZMAN in 1514 ENNIS JOSLIN, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78412 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 339567398.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Emilo Guzman for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Emilo Guzman is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EMILO GUZMAN
Site address
1514 ENNIS JOSLIN
City
CORPUS CHRISTI
State
TX
ZIP
78412
Mailing
2928 MARGUERITE ST, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78405
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:         At this workplace, employees engaged in soffit installation operations on a three story residential building, worked from a platform elevated greater than twenty-five feet by a rough terrain powered industrial truck operated by an uncertified operator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:    At this workplace, employees engaged in soffit installation operations on a three-story residential building at the height greater than twenty-five feet worked from an elevated platform not attached to the forks or the rough terrain powered industrial truck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2014
Abate by
May 21, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   At this workplace, employees engaged in soffit installation operations on a three-story residential building at the height greater than twenty-five feet worked from an elevated platform, and did not have a fall arrest system in place.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339567398.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.