Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WYMAN-GORDON FORGINGS INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WYMAN-GORDON FORGINGS INC in 10825 TELGE ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77095 (NAICS 332111). OSHA activity number 339569188.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wyman-Gordon Forgings INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wyman-Gordon Forgings INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10825 TELGE ROAD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77095
Mailing
10825 TELGE ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77095
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332111
Employees
750
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      The employer does not ensure that a suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes is provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  This violation occurred on or about January 30, 2014, located in Building #11 Test Lab etching area, where employees were exposed to contact hazards when using corrosive chemicals such as, but not limited to, hydrofluoric acid without the eye wash being readily assessable.          Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that a suitable facility for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes is provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $100
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.1450 E03 VII

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(3)(vii): The employer's Chemical Hygiene Plan did not include the designation of personnel responsible for implementation of the Chemical Hygiene Plan, including the assignment of a Chemical Hygiene Officer; and when appropriate, establishment of a chemical hygiene committee:   The employer does not ensure that the Chemical Hygiene Plan includes the designation of personnel responsible for implementation of the plan.  This violation occurred on or about January 27, 2014, located in Building #11 Test Lab, where the Chemical Hygiene Plan did not identify a chemical hygiene officer and/or chemical hygiene committee.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that the Chemical Hygiene Plan includes the designation of personnel responsible for implementation of the plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1450 F03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 28, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1450(f)(3)(ii): The employer did not inform laboratory employees of the location and availability of the Chemical Hygiene Plan:   The employer does not ensure that laboratory employees know the location and availability of the Chemical Hygiene Plan.  This violation occurred on or about January 27, 2014, located in Building #11 Test Lab, where the laboratory employees did not know the location or availability of the Chemical Hygiene Plan.       Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that laboratory employees know the location and availability of the Chemical Hygiene Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Wyman-Gordon Forgings INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339569188.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.