Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: AUTOMATED MACHINE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AUTOMATED MACHINE in 350 INDUSTRIAL RD., WAUPACA, WI 54981 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339572364.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Automated Machine for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Automated Machine is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AUTOMATED MACHINE
Site address
350 INDUSTRIAL RD.
City
WAUPACA
State
WI
ZIP
54981
Mailing
350 INDUSTRIAL RD., WAUPACA, WI 54981
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
15
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a) On February 3, 2014, employees were not being trained every three years on Forklift operations. The forklifts are used throughout the 8 hour shift for the facility.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $714
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:   (a) On February 3, 2014, the employees utilized a fork lift without inspecting it daily to be put into service.The Forklifts are used throughout the shop floor to move pallets of metal brake drums.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not being inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:  a) On February 3, 2014 employees were not required to perform crane inspections on a daily basis.  ABTEMENT CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:  (a) On February 3, 2014, the employer was not performing a complete periodic inspection of the cranes found at the facility.  The facility has several cranes located at each of the pieces of machining equipment to move brake drums from pallet to inside the machine.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $340 · Current $238 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent:  a) On or about February 3, 2014, the employer forms used for recording injuries and illnesses were not an equivalent form for the calendar year 2013.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $238
  • · Z (O) $340

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  a) Employer had not certified the Hazard Assessment as per 1910.132(d)(2).  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program including the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   a)    On February 3, 2014, the employer failed to maintain, implement, and develop a written hazard communication program.  Employee was exposed to eye, skin contact, and respiratory tract chemical hazards with chemicals used in the facility. Example of chemical used include: lubricants, and paints.      ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:   a)      On February 3, 2014 employees were exposed to chemicals in containers not appropriately labeled. Portable containers must be labeled or the contents of the container must be fully used/emptied by the employee who performed the transfer; containers noted around the paint booths and next to the Oosan Machine on the shop floor.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339572364.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.