OSHA Inspection: CITY FENDER & BODY SVC LTD

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures:    On or about February 3, 2014, the employer had not established a written respiratory program as required for the half-mask and supplied air respirators required to be used in the paint booth and other autobody processing area(s).

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about February 3, 2014, the employer had not provided a medical evaluation as required for the workers required to use the half-mask and supplied air respirators in the paint booth and other autobody processing area(s).

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer had not ensured that the employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different  respirator  facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about February 3, 2014, the employer had not ensured that the employees were fit tested as required for the workers required to use the tight-fitting half-mask respirators in use in the paint booth and/or other autobody processing area(s).

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer had not developed, implemented, or maintained a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section will be met:  On or about February 3, 2014, the employer had not compiled and made available to the workers a written hazard communication program for such hazardous materials/chemicals as, but not limited to the paints, solvents, adhesives, etc. in use on site.

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):  Employee training did not include at least an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer and the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  On or about February 3, 2014,  the employer had not provided the detailed training as required for such hazardous materials/chemicals as, but not limited to the PPG autobody paints and Acme paint thinner in use on site.

Issued

Feb 13, 2014

Abate by

Mar 5, 2014

Penalty

Initial $400 · Current $300 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1904.29(a):  OSHA form 300, or its equivalent, were not maintained on site as required:  On or about February 3, 2014, the OSHA form 300 or its equivalent was not maintained on site as required for calendar years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and current year 2014.