Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAM JACK LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of RAM JACK LLC in 13655 COUNTY ROAD 1570, ADA, OK 74820 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339573735.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RAM Jack LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RAM Jack LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAM JACK LLC
Site address
13655 COUNTY ROAD 1570
City
ADA
State
OK
ZIP
74820
Mailing
13655 COUNTY ROAD 1570, ADA, OK 74820
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
80
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2014
Abate by
Jun 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:   Drill operating area. On or about March 27, 2014 and at time prior thereto, the drill operator was exposed to a continuous noise level dose of 218%, which converts to a time-weighted average (TWA) of 95.7 dBA.  Sampling was performed for 284 minutes during an 8 hour shift on March 27, 2014. Zero exposure was assumed for the time not sampled (196 minutes).  The employer had not established a hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95 (c) though (o) where employees were exposed to noise levels above the allowed 85 dBA TWA.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2014
Abate by
May 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   Powder Coating production area. On or about February 4, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to corrosive materials, including but not limited to, Sodium Hydroxide and Phosphoric Acid, and were not provided with emergency eyewash and shower facilities for immediate use within the work area.  Employee(s) were exposed to potential chemical burns of the skin and eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2520
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:  Outside of plasma cutting warehouse. On or about February 4, 2014, and at times prior thereto, oxygen cylinders in storage were found to be stored within 1 foot of acetylene cylinders. Employee(s) were exposed to potential explosion and struck-by hazard(s).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 22, 2014
Abate by
May 14, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about February 4, 2014 and at times prior thereto, a written respiratory protection program was not established at the facility.  Employee(s) are required to use respirators when performing work duties.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339573735.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.