Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLUS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLUS, INC. in 1067 MERLIN POINT, MIDDLEBURG, FL 32068 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339574378.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Construction Management Plus, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Construction Management Plus, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1067 MERLIN POINT
City
MIDDLEBURG
State
FL
ZIP
32068
Mailing
1916 HOLLY OAK DRIVE, ORANGE PARK, FL 32065
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a. On or about February 5, 2014, in the trusses, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun while installing framing components were not using eye protection, exposing himself to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.50(b):   a. On or about February 5, 2014, in the trusses, employees were installing transition boards while conducting framing operations at a height of approximately 26 feet above the ground without a fall arrest system, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.  b. On or about February 5, 2014, on the rear side of the house, an employees was installing framing components in order to support the trusses at a height of approximately 26 feet above the ground, exposing himself to a fall hazard.  c. On or about February 5, 2014, on the right side of the house, employees were installing framing components in order to support the trusses at a height of approximately 12 feet 9-inches above the ground, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2014
Abate by
Mar 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a. On or about February 5, 2014, employees working from elevations were not trained about fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Construction Management Plus, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339574378.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.