MIDDLEBURG, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLUS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLUS, INC. in 1067 MERLIN POINT, MIDDLEBURG, FL 32068 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339574378.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLUS, INC.
- Site address
- 1067 MERLIN POINT
- City
- MIDDLEBURG
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32068
- Mailing
- 1916 HOLLY OAK DRIVE, ORANGE PARK, FL 32065
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about February 5, 2014, in the trusses, an employee using a pneumatic nail gun while installing framing components were not using eye protection, exposing himself to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.50(b): a. On or about February 5, 2014, in the trusses, employees were installing transition boards while conducting framing operations at a height of approximately 26 feet above the ground without a fall arrest system, exposing themselves to a fall hazard. b. On or about February 5, 2014, on the rear side of the house, an employees was installing framing components in order to support the trusses at a height of approximately 26 feet above the ground, exposing himself to a fall hazard. c. On or about February 5, 2014, on the right side of the house, employees were installing framing components in order to support the trusses at a height of approximately 12 feet 9-inches above the ground, exposing themselves to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 13, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about February 5, 2014, employees working from elevations were not trained about fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Construction Management Plus, INC.
View Construction Management Plus, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339574378.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.