TALLAHASSEE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: GANDY PRINTERS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GANDY PRINTERS, INC. in 1800 S. MONROE ST., TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 339578825.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GANDY PRINTERS, INC.
- Site address
- 1800 S. MONROE ST.
- City
- TALLAHASSEE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32301
- Mailing
- 1800 S. MONROE ST., TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,678 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a. On or about February 7, 2014, at Gandy Printers Inc., the employer did not establish and provide an energy control program to their employees while they were required to clean, perform preventive maintenance, and make repairs to machines.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2678
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: a. On or about February 7, 2014, at Gandy Printers Inc., the employer did not conduct periodic inspections at least annually on lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures and requirements. Employees were not locking out machines and did not have record of periodic inspections for the machines they operated. Employees are exposed to pinching, crushing, amputations and death.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: a. On or about February 7, 2014, at Gandy Printers Inc. the employer did not provide training to employees servicing machines about the hazards and procedures to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: a. On or about February 7, 2014, the employer at Gandy Printers Inc., an employee (operators/mechanics) reached into the Kluge Letter Press machine to make adjustments without utilizing a locking device, exposing employees to crushing and amputations from the mechanical plates, moving chains, and rotating wheel. b. On or about February 7, 2014, the employer at Gandy Printers Inc., an employee (operators/mechanics) reached into the Rolan Mabeg Six Ink Printer machine to replace rollers without utilizing a locking device, exposing employees to crushing and amputations from the rotating drums. c. On or about February 7, 2014, the employer at Gandy Printers Inc., an employee (operators/mechanics) reached into the Thermo-O-Type Thermographer to make adjustments without utilizing a locking device, exposing employees to the pinches, burns and amputations from the conveyor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,142 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printing shop, the employer did ensure employees had an flushing station to flush eyes and/or body while using corrosive materials, exposing employees to eye and skin hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $2142
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,731 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printing shop, employees were using a Macey saddlebinder machine that was not guarded by a fixed barrier over the conveyor belts, exposing employees to cuts, bruises, and amputations. b. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printing shop, employees were using a Kluge letter press machine that was not guarded by a fixed barrier over the mechanical power transmission apparatus, exposing employees to cuts, bruises, and amputations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2731
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,276 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printer shop, a live receptacle had several exposed wires protruding that were joined by wire nuts only, exposing employees to electrical shock and fire hazards. b. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printer shop, a live receptacle with no cover had two exposed wires protruding with bare wire showing, exposing employees to electrical shock and fire hazards. c. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printer shop, a live receptacle with the incorrect cover had exposed wires inside with wire nuts, exposing employees to electrical shock and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2276
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,276 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the print shop, receptacles on a cord were being used as a plugs hanging from the ceiling, exposing employees to electrical shock. b. On or about February 7, 2014, in the copy room of the print shop, receptacles on a cord was being used as plugs hanging from the ceiling, exposing employees to electrical shock.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2276
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,821 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the print shop, the employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program, exposing employees to skin, eye, and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $500
- — Z (S) $1821
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the print shop, the employer did not ensure labels were on hazardous material containers, exposing employees to the skin, eye, and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the print shop, the employer did not inform employees on the hazardous chemicals used in the workplaces, exposing employees to skin, eye, ingestion, and inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Apr 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. On or about February 7, 2014, in the printer shop, the employer did not ensure employees were trained in the operation of a forklift, exposing employees to bruises, broken bones and fractures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Gandy Printers, INC.
View Gandy Printers, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339578825.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.