Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARICHEM LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ARICHEM LLC in 187 SLOSS INDUSTRIAL RD, ARITON, AL 36311 (NAICS 325180). OSHA activity number 339579518.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arichem LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arichem LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARICHEM LLC
Site address
187 SLOSS INDUSTRIAL RD
City
ARITON
State
AL
ZIP
36311
Mailing
P.O. BOX 747, ARITON, AL 36311
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325180
Employees
27
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards:    a)  187 Sloss Industries Road, Ariton AL - Warehouse; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around steel storage racks that had damaged columns and support braces.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:   a)  Platform at top of PSK Stairs; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work on a platform 10 foot 2 inches above the next level that did not have a standard handrail which included a mid-rail.   b)  Platform around Reactor #6; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work on a platform 14 foot 2 inches above the next level that did not have a standard handrail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): Flights of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with a standard railing as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section:   a)  Melt Tank; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk up and down a flight of stairs with four or more risers which did not have a standard railing which included a top and mid-rail.   b)  Hot Filter; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk up and down a flight of stairs with four or more risers which did not have a standard railing which included a mid-rail.   c)  Reactor #6; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk up and down a flight of stairs with four or more risers which did not have a standard railing which included a mid-rail.   d)  Reactor #5: On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards in that employees were allowed to walk up and down a flight of stairs with four or more risers which did not have a standard railing which included a top and mid-rail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.146 K02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(k)(2)(iv): An employer whose employees have been designated to provide permit space rescue and emergency services did not ensure that affected employees practiced making permit space rescues at least once every 12 months:   a) Plant Area; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to confined space hazards in that employees were allowed to enter permitted spaces without the company having ensured that each member of the rescue team was trained and had practiced making permit space rescues at least once every 12 months.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:  a)  Plant Area; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to replace a waste water pump together without all employees applying a personal lockout device on the energy control lockout point.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.219 I02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(i)(2): Shaft couplings presented a hazard from bolts, nuts, setscrews, or revolving surfaces:  a)  Melt Tank; On or about February 5, 2014 and at time prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around an unguarded rotating motor shaft coupling.  b)  Reactor #1; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around an unguarded rotating mixer/agitator shaft coupling.   c)  Reactor #21; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around an unguarded rotating mixer/agitator shaft coupling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1428
  • · Z (S) $2380

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,088 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch.   a) Maintenance Shop Area; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that they were allowed to operate a bench grinder with the tongue guard missing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1088
  • · Z (S) $1785

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,529 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:  a)  Blender; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work within three feet of unguarded rotating exposed chain and sprockets that were within five feet of the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2529

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:   a)  Bagging Room; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that employees were allowed to wear dust masks without first being provided the information in Appendix D as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a)  SO3 Tanker Unloading Area;  On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to potential respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting full face negative pressure respirator without first being medically evaluated to ensure the employees are medically able to wear a negative pressure respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2014
Abate by
Mar 27, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the  safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a)  Plant Wide; On or about February 5, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were not provided the new information and training on the UN Global Harmonized System (GHS) to include Safety Data Sheets (SDS).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Arichem LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339579518.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.