Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: HELGET GAS PRODUCTS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HELGET GAS PRODUCTS in 13534 NW INDUSTRIAL DR., BRIDGETON, MO 63044 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 339584732.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Helget GAS Products for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Helget GAS Products is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HELGET GAS PRODUCTS
Site address
13534 NW INDUSTRIAL DR.
City
BRIDGETON
State
MO
ZIP
63044
Mailing
13534 NW INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, BRIDGETON, MO 63044
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424690
Employees
105
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.334 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,060 · Current $2,142 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(4): Conductive work locations. Portable electric equipment and flexible cords were being used in highly conductive work locations (such a those inundated with water or other conductive liquids), or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids, were not approved for those locations.  On or about 02/12/2014, at the SW corner of the dock entry area, a Husky 50' Extension Cord that was being used to plug in trucks to warm up the engines, was not rated for damp/wet locations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2142
  • · Z (S) $3060

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jul 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,890 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about 01/17/2014, a written Hazard Communication Program had not been developed for employees engaged in filling operations.    The employer uses such products as, but not limited to, Helium, Nitrogen, and Oxygen.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1890
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 J01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jul 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(j)(1):  Employers shall train employees regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format by December 1, 2013.        In the filling department, where employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, Helium, Nitrogen, and Oxygen, training on the new label elements and safety data sheets formats was not given by the effective date of December 1, 2013.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.32 B03

Other-than-serious 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $765 · Current $536 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3):  A company executive had not certified that he or she has examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believed, based on his or her knowledge of the process by which the information was recorded, that the annual summary was correct and complete.  On or about 02/12/2014, employer had not certified the OSHA 300 A  logs for 2013,2012, and 2011.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $535.5
  • · Z (O) $765

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2014
Abate by
Jul 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  a/  A written certification had not been done for the workplace hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339584732.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.