Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EKA CONCRETE BUILDERS CORP.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of EKA CONCRETE BUILDERS CORP. in 2721 N.E. 14 ST., POMPANO BEACH, FL 33062 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 339587172.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EKA Concrete Builders Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EKA Concrete Builders Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2721 N.E. 14 ST.
City
POMPANO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33062
Mailing
27843 SW 129 PLACE, HOMESTEAD, FL 33032
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
11
Ownership type
B

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a) On or about February 11, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while conducting concrete forming work from fabricated frame scaffolds that were not fully planked.      2 instances:              1.   Employees had used a 10 foot high scaffold that was not fully planked while installing forms on the rake beam.             2.   Employees had used an 8 foot high scaffold that was not fully planked while installing forms on the rake beam.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   a)     On or about February 11, 2014 at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while conducting concrete forming work from a deficient fabricated frame scaffolds that lacked guardrails and were not fully planked, that had not been inspected by a competent person. 2 instances: Instance 1: Fabricated frame scaffold two tiers, approximately 10 feet high, 5 feet wide lacking guardrails on side and end and lacked a plank creating about a 9 inch gap. Lower surface of concrete. Instance 2:  Fabricated frame scaffold two tiers high, approximately 8 feet high, 5 feet wide that lacked guardrails on side and end and with one and two 9 inch wide planks creating a gap between 40 and 48 inches. Lower surface of concrete.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees:   a)      On or about February 11, 2014, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using a  step ladder in the closed position which was leaning against a structure to access a working surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  a)  On or about February 11, 2014, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while using a step ladder in the closed position which was leaning against a structure to access a working surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  a)      On or about February 11, 2014,  at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while performing concrete forming work without a means of conventional fall protection from a fabricated frame scaffold that lacked guardrails.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a)      On or about February 11, 2014, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while passing materials up to unguarded window openings on an elevated surface, without means of conventional fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B04 I

Serious Gravity 10 11 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights) more than 6 feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes: a)   On or about February 11, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while installing reinforcing steel around uncovered / unguarded holes on an elevate surface, without means of conventional fall protection. 11 instances:  Instance 1-6: 6 ea. small floor openings on second floor. Instance 7-11: 5 ea. stairwell openings on second floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   a)      On or about February 11, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while using portable extension ladders that did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing.   2 Instances:   1.      1 ea. aluminum extension ladder on west side of scaffold.  2.      1 ea. aluminum extension ladder on south side of scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4900

View EKA Concrete Builders Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339587172.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.