BEVERLY, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: 265 ESSEX STREET OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of 265 ESSEX STREET OPERATING COMPANY, LLC in 265 ESSEX STREET, BEVERLY, MA 01915 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339588154.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 265 ESSEX STREET OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
- Site address
- 265 ESSEX STREET
- City
- BEVERLY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01915
- Mailing
- 265 ESSEX STREET, BEVERLY, MA 01915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 236
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
X100
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by and/or fire hazards: a) Location - Therapy office: On or about February 14, 2014, a cylinder of oxygen in storage was unsecured and without the valve protection cap.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $4500
- · Z (S) $4500
1926.304 I01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1): A circular hand-fed ripsaw was not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed the portion of the saw above the table and the portion of the saw above the material being cut. a.) Location - Maintenance Shop On or about February 14, 2014, in the course of performing construction activities, an employee removed the guard from a Skilsaw, model 3400, exposing the employee to potential laceration hazards."
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2000
- · C (S) $4500
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.303 G01 I C
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(C): For electrical equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less, to ground, the work space from the floor to a level below the electrical equipment was not kept clear within 153mm (6 in) below the front of the electric equipment. a.) Location - Basement Hall, Kitchen Area On or about February 14, 2014, mobile dietary delivery carts were temporarily stored on the floor below electrical control panels.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $2000
- · C (S) $3600
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about February 14, 2014, the employer's written Exposure Control Plan was last reviewed and updated March 2011.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $3600
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure: a) Location - Establishment: On or about February 14, 2014, the employer supplied written bloodborne pathogens Exposure Control Plan did not include any documentation regarding the required annual safer medical devices review.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $2000
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C02 I C
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(C): The exposure determination did not include a list of all tasks and procedures or groups of closely related tasks and procedures in which occupational exposure occurs and that are performed by employees in job classifications listed in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i)(B): a) Location - Establishment: On or about February 14, 2014, the employer's written exposure control plan did not include a listing of procedures or tasks that would result in potential exposure to bloodborne pathogens. The program states only "emergency situations."
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339588154.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.