Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: HILL MASONRY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HILL MASONRY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY in HWY 158, SARALAND, AL 36571 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339588584.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hill Masonry Limited Liability Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hill Masonry Limited Liability Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HWY 158
City
SARALAND
State
AL
ZIP
36571
Mailing
P.O. BOX 642, STAPLETON, AL 36578
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights was not fully planked:  (a)  The scaffold on the east wall:  On February 18, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to fully plank all working levels of the scaffold, exposing emplooyees to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 G04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  (a)  On the east wall scaffold:  On February 18, 2014, the employer failed to provide a guard rail system along all open sides of the scaffold, exposing employees to falls of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally:  (a)  The east wall scaffold:  On February 18, 2014, the employer failed to brace the middle three sections of the scaffold as well as other sections, exposing the employees to struck-by hazards from a collapsing scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.451 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  (a)  The east side scaffold:  On February 18, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to provide a competent person to inspect the scaffold for defects prior to allowing employees to work on the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a)  At the worksite in Saraland, AL: On February 18, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a)  At the worksite:  On February 18, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to maintain safety data sheets at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a)  At the worksite:  On February 18, 2014 and at times prior to; the employer failed to provide hazard communication training to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339588584.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.