BENBROOK, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: DANIEL J. FERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL J. FERNANDEZ in 8909 LADERA CT., BENBROOK, TX 76109 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339590192.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DANIEL J. FERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 8909 LADERA CT.
- City
- BENBROOK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76109
- Mailing
- 6814 BROOKHAVEN, FORT WORTH, TX 76133
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.307 D01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet (2.128 m) or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section:Note: Pulleys serving as balance wheels (e.g., punch presses) on which the point of contact between belt and pulley is more than 6 ft. 6 in. (1.976 m) from the floor or platform may be guarded with a disk covering the spokes. On or about February 14, 2014, on the west side of the construction site, employees utilized an air-compressor with an unguarded pulley exposing employees to caught-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.307 E01 I
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.307(e)(1)(i): Where both runs of a horizontal belt were 42 inches (106.68 cm) or less from the floor, the belt was not fully enclosed. On or about February 14, 2014, on the west side of the construction site, employees utilized an air-compressor with an unguarded belt exposing employees to caught-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap. On or about February 14, 2014, on the west side of the work site, employees engaged in roofing activities utilized an extension cord spliced to another extension cord exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about February 14, 2014, on the west side of the construction site, employees engaged in roofing activities without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. On or about February 14, 2014, on the west side of the residential home, employees using an extension ladder to access the roof without the side rails extending 3 feet above the landing were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 22 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339590192.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.