Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: OVER THE TOP ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OVER THE TOP ROOFING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 10916 75 ST., BUILDING B, KENOSHA, WI 53142 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339593048.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Over the TOP Roofing & Construction, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Over the TOP Roofing & Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10916 75 ST., BUILDING B
City
KENOSHA
State
WI
ZIP
53142
Mailing
N59 W14464 BOBOLINK AVE., MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
Apr 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $840 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.     (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was being used when conducting siding work on an apartment building, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $840
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2014
Abate by
May 23, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  (a) The employer did not ensure that an employee was trained in using fall protection when conducting work from an aerial lift, exposing an employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339593048.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.