SALEM, AL —
OSHA Inspection: ATCHLEY STEEL COMPANY INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ATCHLEY STEEL COMPANY INC in 12505 US HWY 280E, SALEM, AL 36874 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 339593543.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ATCHLEY STEEL COMPANY INC
- Site address
- 12505 US HWY 280E
- City
- SALEM
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36874
- Mailing
- 12505 US HWY 280E, SALEM, AL 36874
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,890 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding areas were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or were not required to wear appropriate goggles: a) Arc Welding Workstations: On or about February 18, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure workers and/or other persons in the adjacent areas were required to use eye protection (e.g. welding curtains, tinted safety glasses, and/or an equivalent) which exposed employees to eye injuries associated with exposures to welding rays.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1890
1910.305 A02 X
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,607 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(x): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from accidental damage, as might be caused, for example, by sharp corners, projections, and doorways or other pinch points: a) Bay 1 Cut Shop: On or about February 18, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure an extension cord set up for temporary use was protected from damage (e.g. abrasion) from the metal siding it was run through which exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1607
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Abate by
- May 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) 12505 US Hwy 280, Salem, AL: On or about February 18, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not generate and/or maintain written records certifying the completed forklift operator training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- May 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with either the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers or with the product identifier and pictures, symbols or combination thereof which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: a) Production Area: On or about February 18, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure a secondary container was labeled which exposed employees to chemical hazards associated with Hold Tight 102.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Atchley Steel Company INC
View Atchley Steel Company INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339593543.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.