HOLLISTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: 84 ELM ST., INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of 84 ELM ST., INC. in 84 ELM STREET, HOLLISTON, MA 01746 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339595985.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 84 ELM ST., INC.
- Site address
- 84 ELM STREET
- City
- HOLLISTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01746
- Mailing
- 84 ELM STREET, HOLLISTON, MA 01746
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 II
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C): (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the Exposure Control Plan was not site-specific and did not include this facilities methods of compliance, location of post exposure evaluation medical facility, training records, and recordkeeping information.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1030 C01 IV A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 22, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(A): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not reflect changes in technology that elimnate or reduce exposure to bloodborne pathogens: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did not consider newer technology for updated engineering controls and safer medical devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did not evaluate safer medical devices annually.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1910.1030 C01 V
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(v): The employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control Plan, did not solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation and selection of effective engineering and work practice controls and did not document the solicitation in the Exposure Control plan: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did not involve employees in the evaluation and selection of safer medical devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(A): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain an accessible copy of the regulatory text of this standard and an explanation of its contents: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did not include the OSHA requirements in the bloodborne pathogens training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1030 G02 VII D
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(D): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain an explanation of the employer's exposure control plan and the means by which the employee could obtain a copy of the written plan: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did not train employees on the accessibility of the exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII L
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(L): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain information on the post exposure evaluation or follow-up that the employer was required to provide for the employee following an exposure incident: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer did inform employees of procedures for post exposure evaluation or follow-up during annual training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 VII N
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(N): The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain an opportunity for interactive questions or answers with the person conducting the training session: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the employer's bloodborne pathogens training did not allow employees to ask questions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 H02 I
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(2)(i): The employer's records for annual bloodborne pathogen training did not include all of the elements required by (h)(2)(i)(A)-(D) of 29 CFR 1910.1030: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, the records for annual training did not include the date, content of material, names and job titles, and name of person conducting training,.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 3/14/14, the employer did not have a Hazard Communication program to protect employees working with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to Oasis 137 Orange Force cleaner, Wash N Walk No-Rinse Floor cleaner, and Germicidal Ultra Bleach.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.157 G03
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $595 · Current $298 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(3): Employees who have been designated to use fire fighting equipment as part of the emergency action plan were not provided training in the use of the appropriate equipment: (a) Location - Establishment: On or about 2/21/14, employees expected to use fire extinguishers in the event of a fire were not provided training in the use and hazards of fire fighting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $297.5
- — Z (O) $595
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339595985.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.