Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: J.E. HOFFMAN & CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J.E. HOFFMAN & CO. in 739 NORTH LAKE ST., MUNDELEIN, IL 60060 (NAICS 332721). OSHA activity number 339599193.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.E. Hoffman & CO. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.E. Hoffman & CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
J.E. HOFFMAN & CO.
Site address
739 NORTH LAKE ST.
City
MUNDELEIN
State
IL
ZIP
60060
Mailing
739 NORTH LAKE ST., MUNDELEIN, IL 60060
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332721
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer failed to conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard were being followed.      a) Facility Wide- The employer failed to conduct periodic inspections to inspect the energy control procedure and to review each authorized employees knowledge of the procedures at least annually to verify the procedures are adequate and being applied properly by all authorized employees.       In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.        a) Facility Wide - The employer did not ensure all authorized employees received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type of magnitude of the energy available in the work place, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.      In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.147 C07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date:  a) Facility Wide - The employer did not certify that all employee training on the lock out tag out procedures (authorized employees, affected employees) had been accomplished and kept up to date.  In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): The employer did not ensure that an evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance is being conducted at least once every three years:     a)  Facility Wide - An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years.     In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2014
Abate by
Apr 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a) CNC Area - The sliding barrier door on the Okuma CNC machine (206B) would not prevent entry of hands into the point of operation.  The interlock device was not connected allowing the door to be opened during operation.    b) CNC Area - The sliding barrier doors on the Okuma CNC machines (202, 206A, 207, 208B) would not prevent entry of hands into the point of operation.  The machines were not equipped interlock devices to prevent the doors from being opened during operation.  c) CNC Area - The sliding barrier doors on the Cell-Con machine (201Z) would not prevent entry of hands into the point of operation.  The machine was not equipped with an interlock device to prevent the doors from being opened during operation.  In accordance with 29CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

View J.E. Hoffman & CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339599193.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.