SULLIVAN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: PETERSEN HEALTH CARE, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PETERSEN HEALTH CARE, INC. in 100 EASTVIEW PLACE, SULLIVAN, IL 61951 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339599953.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PETERSEN HEALTH CARE, INC.
- Site address
- 100 EASTVIEW PLACE
- City
- SULLIVAN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61951
- Mailing
- 100 EASTVIEW PLACE, SULLIVAN, IL 61951
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,275 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: Employees were exposed to tripping hazards because stools, wastebaskets, boxes and other items were stored in the laundry room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1275
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: Employees performed cleaning and maintenance activities which required personal protective equipment to be worn, and the employer had not conducted a PPE hazard assessment and equipment selection to protect the employees from the hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: Employees perform maintenance and cleaning activities which require personal protective equipment to be worn, and the employer did not verify that a hazard assessment and equipment selection had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: Employees work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Nickel-Safe Ice Machine Cleaner and LSR Delimer, and the employer did not provide adequate training to employees required to use personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: Employees were exposed to the hazard of eye contact with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Nickel-Safe Machine Cleaner and LSR Delimer, and the employees were not required to wear appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: Employees were exposed to the hazard of skin absorption of harmful chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Nickel-Safe Ice Machine Cleaner and LSR Delimer, and the employees were not required to wear appropriate hand protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $2,975 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Employees were exposed to eye injuries while working around and with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Nickel-Safe Ice Machine Cleaner and LSR Delimer, and an emergency eyewash that could provide the required fifteen minutes of flushing was not available to immediate use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2975
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,275 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: An employee was exposed to injury during grinding operations because the work rest on the grinding machine was adjusted to the wheel with an opening greater than one-eighth inch. The opening was 1- 7/8 inch.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1275
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel: An employee was exposed to injury during grinding operations because the tongue guards on the bench grinder were bent thus rendering them ineffective.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Aug 19, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $2,380 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: An employee was exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards because the electrical outlet located in Cadwell Road was not equipped with a suitable cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2380
- — Z (S) $3400
More inspections at Petersen Health Care, INC.
View Petersen Health Care, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339599953.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.