MADISON, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: M B STEEL CO INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M B STEEL CO INC in 9 FOX INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, MADISON, IL 62060 (NAICS 332618). OSHA activity number 339600447.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- M B STEEL CO INC
- Site address
- 9 FOX INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
- City
- MADISON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62060
- Mailing
- 9 FOX INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, MADISON, IL 62060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332618
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a power industrial truck. Employees are exposed to injuries while operating a Caterpillar 80, or a Hyster 120 forklift, and the employer did not ensure that the operators had successfully completed the training required by 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.179 J02 III
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed: Employees were exposed to falling equipment or materials when safety latches on hooks were removed from 15 and 20 ton cranes, and monthly inspections of hooks were not performed and recorded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months: The employees were exposed to struck by hazards while operating 10 and 20 ton overhead cranes, and the employer did not conduct complete periodic inspections of cranes in the past 12 months.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: The employees are exposed to electrical shocks/burns while using a Black' N 'Decker 3/4 inch Heavy Duty Drill with an electrical power tap which was not used in accordance with its labeling instructions.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2): Polarity of connections. No grounded conductor may be attached to any terminal or lead so as to reverse designated polarity. Employees were exposed to the hazard of electrical shock when using a 3/4 inch metal Black 'N Decker Drill and the polarity was reverse on the receptacle servicing the drill.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1040
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $780 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Calumet 142 for cleaning operations, and sheet steel during cutting operations, and the employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $780
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Calumet 142 for cleaning operations, and sheet steel during cutting operations, and the employer did not provide employees effective information and training of hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332618)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339600447.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.