Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: LYKE CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LYKE CORPORATION in 16000 WEST ROGERS DRIVE SUITE 200, NEW BERLIN, WI 53151 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 339601973.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lyke Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lyke Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LYKE CORPORATION
Site address
16000 WEST ROGERS DRIVE SUITE 200
City
NEW BERLIN
State
WI
ZIP
53151
Mailing
656 SOUTH DOUGLAS STREET, RIPON, WI 54971
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2014
Abate by
Apr 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a)  Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while cleaning the UV Coater (Model #TC3030-1-14-A and Serial #CON-1453) and the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was properly guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2014
Abate by
Apr 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  (a)  Employees were exposed to health hazards while using the Coatings Cleaner AC (Aqueous Coatings Cleaner) and the employer did not ensure that each container was properly labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2014
Abate by
Apr 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  (a)  Employees were exposed to health hazards while working with products, such as but no limited to, Coatings Cleaner AC (Aqueous Coatings Cleaner) and UV Digital Satin Coating, and the employer did not ensure that employees knew the location of the material safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339601973.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.