PASADENA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: NICOLAS HINOJOSA-PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICOLAS HINOJOSA-PEREZ in 6226 SANDS DRIVE, PASADENA, TX 77505 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339604589.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NICOLAS HINOJOSA-PEREZ
- Site address
- 6226 SANDS DRIVE
- City
- PASADENA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77505
- Mailing
- 13738 MUSCATIVE STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77015
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: a) At the worksite - Scrap material such as bricks, lumber, and tie straps were not cleared away from the site, creating a tripping hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.300 B04 II
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(4)(ii): The point of operation of machine(s) whose operation exposed an employee to injury was not guarded: a) At the worksite - The lower blade guard of a DeWalt 14" Chop Saw (Model Number D28700) was missing. Employees were using the saw to cut bricks.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a) At the site, on the north exterior east most scaffold, employees were exposed to falls of 14' while bricklaying from a welded frame scaffold which was not fully planked. b)At the site, on the north exterior central scaffold, employees were exposed to falls of 14' while bricklaying from a welded frame scaffold which was not fully planked. c)At the site, on the north exterior west most scaffold, employees were exposed to falls of 14' while bricklaying from a welded frame scaffold which was not fully planked. d)At the site, on the east exterior north most scaffold, employees were exposed to falls of 14' while bricklaying from a welded frame scaffold which was not fully planked. e)At the site, on the east exterior central most scaffold, employees were exposed to falls of 14' while bricklaying from a welded frame scaffold which was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: a) North exterior- Cross braces and end frames were used as a means of access to the working level of tubular welded frame scaffolding, 14 feet above the ground. b) East exterior- Cross braces and end frames were used as a means of access to the working level of tubular welded frame scaffolding, 14 feet above the ground.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: A) At the site - Tubular welded frame scaffolds used for performing brick work were not inspected by a competent person prior to use by employees.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Apr 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a) At the site, on the north exterior side east most scaffold - Employees working approximately 14 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system. b) At the site, on the north exterior side central scaffold - Employees working approximately 14 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system. c) At the site, on the north exterior side west most scaffold - Employees working approximately 14 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system. d) At the site, on the east exterior side north most scaffold -Employees working approximately 15 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system. e) At the site, on the east exterior side central platform - Employees working approximately 15 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2400
More inspections at Nicolas Hinojosa-Perez
View Nicolas Hinojosa-Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339604589.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.