Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ANTELOPE OIL TOOL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANTELOPE OIL TOOL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY in 6614 GANT RD, HOUSTON, TX 77066 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 339604936.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antelope OIL Tool & Manufacturing Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antelope OIL Tool & Manufacturing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6614 GANT RD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77066
Mailing
6614 GANT RD, HOUSTON, TX 77066
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  The employer does not guard all machines whose operation exposes employees to injury. This violation occurred on or about February 28, 2014, in the manufacturing area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a HYD-Mech brand horizontal band saw without a blade guard.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure the hazardous areas on all machines are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:  The employer does not ensure that employees required to operate forklifts are trained and evaluated. This violation occurred on or about February 28, 2014, when employees in the facility were required to operate forklifts while moving material without having been trained and evaluated.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that they provide the employees training consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2014
Abate by
Mar 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  The employer does not ensure that all chemicals in the workplace are labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and hazard warning of those chemicals. This violation occurred on or about February 28, 2014, in the manufacturing area where a spray bottle containing what was believed to be a cleaner was being stored without a label or markings as to the chemicals identity or hazard warnings.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all chemical containers in the workplace are labeled with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings of the chemicals therein.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339604936.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.