ATLANTA, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: CONTRAPAC, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CONTRAPAC, INC. in 675 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY, ATLANTA, GA 30336 (NAICS 561910). OSHA activity number 339608119.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONTRAPAC, INC.
- Site address
- 675 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY
- City
- ATLANTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30336
- Mailing
- 675 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY, ATLANTA, GA 30336
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561910
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2014
- Abate by
- May 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards from ladders that were used and/or modified contrary to manufacturers recommendations: a) Warehouse - Hopper#1 - An employee utilized a Werner Aluminum 8-foot step ladder to access a platform that requires the employee to step off the ladder and using a step on the ladder that is marked not to be used, therefore exposing the employee to an 8 foot fall hazard. b) Warehouse - Hopper#2 - An employee utilized the top section of a Werner 24 foot aluminum extension ladder with the top two rungs removed, to access the platform to the hopper, therefore exposing the employee to an 8 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2940
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2014
- Abate by
- May 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: Note: Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard. a) Warehouse Hopper #1 - The working platform that surrounds the hopper was used to fill customer packages of pool chemicals. The platform was not guarded by guardrails or toe boards, exposing employees to fall hazards of 8 feet 2 inches and struck by hazards from falling debris. b) Warehouse Hopper #2 - The working platform that surrounds the hopper was used to fill customer packages of pool chemicals. The platform is not guarded by guardrails or toe boards, exposing employees to fall hazards of 8 feet 8 inches and struck by hazards from falling debris. c) Warehouse - The working area located on the second floor of the warehouse where employees fill the mechanical hoppers was not completely guarded by standard railings and toe boards, exposing employees to fall hazards of 9 feet, 3 inches and struck-by hazards from falling debris.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2940
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2014
- Abate by
- May 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) Warehouse - Two forklift operators had been trained, but the training was in June 2009. The employees had not received an evaluation since the training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 22, 2014
- Abate by
- May 16, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) Warehouse - An employee provided by the temporary employment agency was trained by the agency but not certified by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Contrapac, INC.
View Contrapac, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561910)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339608119.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.