CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: DECKER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DECKER INDUSTRIES, INC. in 14902 ST. HWY 124, CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 54729 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339610016.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DECKER INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 14902 ST. HWY 124
- City
- CHIPPEWA FALLS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54729
- Mailing
- 14902 ST. HWY 124, CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI 54729
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not provide forklift training to the employees prior to operation of forklifts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: a) Throughout the facility; The powered industrial trucks were not inspected prior to being placed into service.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) At the Dynapath Metal Lathe; Adequate machine guarding was not in place on the lathe for rotating parts and flying chip protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes: a) At the liquified petroleum tank changing area; The employer did not require the employees to use hand protection when changing out the liquified petroleum tanks on the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339610016.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.