Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: LATEX FOAM INTERNATIONAL LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LATEX FOAM INTERNATIONAL LLC in 12 COMMERCE DRIVE, SHELTON, CT 06484 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 339611055.

Watch Latex Foam International LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Latex Foam International LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12 COMMERCE DRIVE
City
SHELTON
State
CT
ZIP
06484
Mailing
510 RIVER ROAD, SHELTON, CT 06484
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326299
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1): Standard railing(s) did not consist of top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts and/or did not have a vertical height of 42 inches (106.7 cm) nominal from upper surface of top rail to floor, platform runway, or ramp level.    Loft storage area:  The open-sided floor of the loading bay on the second floor was not guarded by a standard guardrail or an equivalent, exposing employees to the hazard of falling approximately 11 feet to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:         Spray Area:  The employer did not conduct the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine the necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees performing various tasks, such as (but not limited to) spray finishing and other operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required to by this section to use personal protective equipment(PPE):       Spray Area:  The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment while performing various tasks were not provided with training and information pertaining to the Workplace Hazard Assessment for PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees    Shop: The recognized electric hazards due to lack of appropriate strain relief device at the opening through which a flexible power cord entered an electric box were not eliminated and controlled through examination and inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:      Shop: The opening through which the flexible power cord entered the electric box of the table saw was not equipped with an appropriate "strain relief" device.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:       Facility: A written Hazardous Communication Program was not kept at the worksite for the employees required to use and work with chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:     Facility:  The written Hazard Communication Program did not contain a list of chemicals that were cross referenced to MSDS / SDSs within the binder that held the MSDSs / SDSs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

PRETRED

PRETRED

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339611055.