Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TAZ FLOORING & DESIGN

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAZ FLOORING & DESIGN in 9975 TRIANGLE BLVD., NAPLES, FL 34113 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 339611535.

Watch TAZ Flooring & Design — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TAZ Flooring & Design is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9975 TRIANGLE BLVD.
City
NAPLES
State
FL
ZIP
34113
Mailing
2615 PLACIDA RD., ENGLEWOOD, FL 34224
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    On or about 5 March, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were working from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was not fully planked, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about 5 March 2014, on the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not inspect the tubular scaffold the employees were utilizing to conduct masonry work on the building under construction, exposing the employee to fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross-braces were used as a means of access:    On or about March 5, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were accessing the tubular welded scaffolding by climbing the cross-braces and side frames rails and not utilizing a ladder, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    On or about 5 March, 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were working from a scaffold which was positioned on the roof of the building under construction, up to approximately 21 feet high without the employer providing fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about 3 March, 2014, on the above addressed job site, two employees were accessing a scaffold located on the roof of the building without the use of fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On or about 5 March 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were utilizing an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof without extending the ladder at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    On or about 5 March 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was accessing the roof of the building by climbing a ladder while carrying a bucket of concrete mix, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    On or about 5 March 2014, at the above addressed jobsite, two employees were utilizing an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof without receiving training on how to properly utilize a ladder, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339611535.