HOLLYWOOD, FL —
OSHA Inspection: GLOBAL ROOFING SPECIALIST, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GLOBAL ROOFING SPECIALIST, INC. in 2930 HOLLYWOOD BLVD, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339611824.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GLOBAL ROOFING SPECIALIST, INC.
- Site address
- 2930 HOLLYWOOD BLVD
- City
- HOLLYWOOD
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33020
- Mailing
- 216 SOUTH 16 AVE APT NR 8, HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. On or about March 05, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling while working on the roof of a commercial building without a fall protection system in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about March 05, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were allowed to work on the roof of a commercial building with unprotected edges without being trained on how to recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about March 05, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were allowed to use an extension ladder that did not extend 3 feet past the landing surface to gain access to the roof of a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
1926.1053 B08
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder: a. On or about March 05, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were allowed to use an extension ladder, to gain access to the roof of a commercial building, that was not secured from displacement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B12
- Issued
- Apr 11, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive siderails: a. On or about March 05, 2014, at the above addressed job site, employees were allowed to use a metal extension ladder near energized power lines, while conducting roof repairs on a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339611824.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.