CLEMENTON, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: VICTORIA SIDING & ROOFING, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VICTORIA SIDING & ROOFING, INC. in 104 EMERSON COURT, CLEMENTON, NJ 08021 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339614067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VICTORIA SIDING & ROOFING, INC.
- Site address
- 104 EMERSON COURT
- City
- CLEMENTON
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08021
- Mailing
- 290 ELBERON TERRACE, LONG BRANCH, NJ 07740
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification for abatement of citation 1 item 1 in which employees were not provided guardrail systems and/or no personal fall arrest systems. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. b) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification for abatement of citation 1 item 2 in which the supported scaffold poles, legs, post, fames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. c) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification for abatement of citation 1 item 3 in scaffold platforms above or below a point of access, portable ladders, attachable ladders, or any direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist or similar surface was not used. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. d) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification for abatement of citation 1 item 4 in which scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected by a competent person. Condition observed on or about03/05/14. e) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification for abatement of citations 1 item 6 in which poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. f) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement of citation 1 item 7 in which the employer did not provide scaffold training. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. g) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement of citation 1 item 8 in which ladders were used on slippery surfaces. Condition observed on or about 03/01/14. h) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement of citation 2 item 1 in which supported scaffold poles did not bear on the base plates, mud sills or adequate firm foundation. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14. I) The employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement of citation 2 item 2 in which employees were not provided fall protection. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2015
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer failed to provide certification for abatement of citation 1 item 5 in which the employees were not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects. Condition observed on or about 03/05/14.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.451 B03
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately 11-16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold platform approximately 24 inches from the front face of the building, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C03
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold without proper bracing or equivalent means (poles were braced only at the roof), on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, unit #3, northern most scaffold setup-Employees were working approximately 7 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold with poles bearing on a scrapped piece of siding, on or about 03/05/14; c) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building - Employees were working approximately 12 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold with poles bearing on a scrapped piece of siding, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a) 104 Emerson Court, unit #3, northern most scaffold setup - One employee working approximately 7 feet above the ground, slid down the northern most pole to get down from the working level, on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building - Employees climbing down from the approximately 12 foot high scaffold platform used an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the surface they were climbing down from, above the ground used an extension ladder which, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, poles not place of a proper foundation, poles out of plumb, consisted of a mix of components inconsistent with the manufacturer's design, a lack of proper fall protection, lack of proper means of access, use of unstable objects used to support poles, on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, unit #3, northern most scaffold setup - Employees were working approximately 7 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, poles not place of a proper foundation, poles out of plumb, consisted of a mix of components inconsistent with the manufacturer's design, a lack of proper fall protection, lack of proper means of access, use of unstable objects used to support poles, on or about 03/05/14; c) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building - Employees were working approximately 12 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, poles not place of a proper foundation, poles out of plumb, consisted of a mix of components inconsistent with the manufacturer's design, a lack of proper fall protection, lack of proper means of access, use of unstable objects used to support poles, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit-Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system without adequate toeboards or other acceptable means to contain or deflect falling objects, on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, unit #3, northern most scaffold setup-Employees were working approximately 7 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system without adequate toeboards or other acceptable means to contain or deflect falling objects, on or about 03/05/14; c) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building-Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system without adequate toeboards or other acceptable means to contain or deflect falling objects, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 AS PER 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, unit #3, northern most scaffold setup - Employees were working approximately 7 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, on or about 03/05/14; c) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building - Employees were working approximately 12 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold system with numerous defects, such as: poles only braced at the roof, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a) 104 Emerson Court Construction Site - Employees without proper training were working from three improperly setup aluminum pump jack scaffolds, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B07
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7): Ladders were used on slippery surfaces: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit - Employee used an aluminum extension ladder bearing on a couple of sheets of 4 foot x 8 foot plywood laying on the ground while installing metal roofing to the top of the box bay window approximately 18 feet above ground level, on or about 03/01/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $500
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,600 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a) 104 Emerson Court, unit #4, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately16 feet above the ground, from a pump jack scaffold with poles bearing on a scrapped piece of siding, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19. Victoria Siding & Roofing Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315978916, citation number 01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on 02/23/12, with respect to a workplace located at Ocean Avenue, Long Branch, NJ 07740.
Recent events (3)
- — J (R) $1600
- — C (R) $5600
- — Z (R) $5600
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,600 · Current $1,600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) 104 Emerson Court, southern most unit, end unit - Employees were working approximately 16 feet above the ground, did not have proper fall protection for all sides of the scaffold as required, on or about 03/05/14; b) 104 Emerson Court, scaffold setup on the south end of building - Employees were working approximately 12 feet above the ground, did not have proper fall protection for all sides of the scaffold as required, on or about 03/05/14. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19. The Victoria Siding & Roofing, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 315978916, citation number 01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on 02/23/12, with respect to a workplace located at Ocean Avenue, Long Branch, NJ 07740.
Recent events (3)
- — J (R) $1600
- — C (R) $5600
- — Z (R) $5600
More inspections at Victoria Siding & Roofing, INC.
View Victoria Siding & Roofing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339614067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.