Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: SELJAN COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SELJAN COMPANY, INC. in 100 SOUTH CP AVE., LAKE MILLS, WI 53551 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 339614612.

Watch Seljan Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seljan Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 SOUTH CP AVE.
City
LAKE MILLS
State
WI
ZIP
53551
Mailing
P.O. BOX 158, LAKE MILLS, WI 53551
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:    On or about June 3, 2014, the employer had not utilized feasible administrative or engineering controls where employee exposures were equal or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels measured on the A scale:    a) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 89.98 dBA with a severity of 1.059.    b) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 89.12 dBA with a severity of 1.048.    c) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.72 dBA with a severity of 1.008.    d) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 91.51 dBA with a severity of 1.017.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    On or about March 6, 2014, the employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95 (c)-(o) when employee exposures were equal or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels on the A scale:    a) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 89.98 dBA with a severity of 1.059.    b) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 89.12 dBA with a severity of 1.048.    c) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.72 dBA with a severity of 1.008.    d) On June 3, 2014, a rotomold operator was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 91.51 dBA with a severity of 1.017.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $3200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about March 6, 2014, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees wearing cartridge-equipped elastomeric half-mask respirators.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3200
  • — C (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 068915201620M149

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    On or about June 3, 2014, employees who were provided tight-fitting half mask respirators for voluntary use in multiple areas of the facility were not provided medical questionnaires or evaluations to determine if employees were medically capable of safely wearing respiratory protection.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 15201620M149

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:    On or about June 3, 2014, employees provided tight fitting half mask respirators for voluntary use were not provided respirator information found in Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $800
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $4000.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0689107315201620

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about March 6, 2014, the employer had not provided hazard communication training to employees who during the course of their various job duties are exposed to hazardous substances including, but are not limited to:  hexavalent chromium, welding fumes, polyethylene dust, and isocyanates (polyurethane molding).    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4000
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  On or about March 6, 2014, the employer had not performed a PPE hazard assessment of the various hazards to which employees are exposed.  Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  On or about March 6, 2014, the employer had not certified through written documentation that a PPE hazard assessment had been performed.  Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1020 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1): The employer did not inform current employees upon their first entering in to employment and at least annually thereafter, of the existence, location, and availability of any records covered by 29 CFR 1910:     On or about March 6, 2014, the employer had not provided medical record access training to employees who participated in air and noise monitoring.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339614612.