BROKEN ARROW, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: AERON GROUP, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AERON GROUP, LLC in 1901 N WILLOW AVE, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 339614810.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AERON GROUP, LLC
- Site address
- 1901 N WILLOW AVE
- City
- BROKEN ARROW
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74012
- Mailing
- 1901 N WILLOW AVE, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about March 06, 2014, and at times prior thereto the employer did not establish an energy control program and had not conducted training. Employees were exposed to the hazard of electrical shock and/or being caught in or crushed by machinery such as but not limited to mechanical power presses and press brakes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 30, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. On or about March 06, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees were authorized to operate powered industrial trucks without receiving adequate training. Employees were exposed to the hazard of being crushed by/struck by the powered industrial truck or a falling load.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: On or about March 06, 2014 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not require industrial trucks be examined prior to being placed in service. Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by/crushed by the powered industrial truck or a falling load.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about March 06, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide machine guarding on: a) Wysong press brake and b) the unused portion of the vertical band saw. Employees were exposed to the hazard of being caught in or crushed by the point of operation and being cut by the blade of the band saw.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1300
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.217 C01 I
- Issued
- May 21, 2014
- Abate by
- May 23, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(1)(i): The employer did not provide and ensure the usage of point of operation guards or properly applied point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power press(es): On or about March 6, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide point of operation guards or point of operation devices on every operation performed on mechanical power presses, such as, but not limited to: a) Rousselle mechanical power press located in center of shop Employees were exposed to the hazard of being caught in the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339614810.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.