HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: GILMON FOX
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GILMON FOX in 11335 KATY FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX 77079 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339615247.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GILMON FOX
- Site address
- 11335 KATY FREEWAY
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77079
- Mailing
- 5729 LEBANON RD. SUITE 144-427, FRISCO, TX 75034
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $3,080
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment were conducted by a competent person: a) At the worksite, regular inspections were not performed frequent enough to ensure; employees were protected from fall hazards, ladders were not used for a purpose that it was not designed and that ladders extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3080
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a) At the worksite, where an employee was performing welding operations on top of a second story roof without any type of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) At the worksite where employees used an extension ladder to access an upper landing surface with its side rails not extended at least 3 feet above that landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) At the worksite, where an employee rested a stepladder against the fascia board of a second story roof to gain access to that same roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Gilmon FOX
View Gilmon FOX's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339615247.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.