Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ALLIANCE DAIRIES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ALLIANCE DAIRIES in 4951 NW 170TH ST, TRENTON, FL 32693 (NAICS 112120). OSHA activity number 339622789.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alliance Dairies for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alliance Dairies is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALLIANCE DAIRIES
Site address
4951 NW 170TH ST
City
TRENTON
State
FL
ZIP
32693
Mailing
4951 NW 170TH ST, TRENTON, FL 32693
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
112120
Employees
140
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced

Hazardous substances 186020852260H159R224

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   a.    On or about March 10, 2014, employees, working at the Parlor II area, were exposed to injurious corrosive materials such as but not limited to Gladiator Barrier Base, Gladiator Barrier Activator, Guard 100, and Acid 60. The employer did not provide for the quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced

Hazardous substances H159R224

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  a.    On or about March 10, 2014, employees, working in the cow milking area of Parlor II, were using multiple three gallon blue secondary containers of corrosive chemicals, such as but not limited to, a mixture of Gladiator Barrier Base and Gladiator Barrier Activator.  The multiple three gallon blue secondary containers did not have a label showing the identity of the hazardous chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances H159R224

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  a.    On or about March 10, 2014, employees, working in the cow milking area of Parlor II, were using multiple three gallon blue secondary containers of corrosive chemicals, such as but not limited to, a mixture of Gladiator Barrier Base and Gladiator Barrier Activator.  The multiple three gallon blue secondary containers did not have a label showing the appropriate hazard warnings for the hazardous chemical contained therein.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jul 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.    On or about April 02, 2014, an employee was required to wear a 3M 5203 half face respirator with 3M organic vapor/ acid gas cartridge while handling chemical, formaldehyde, in the Parlor II.  The employer had not established nor implemented a written respirator protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1048 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jul 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 12911293

29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2): Employees who may have been exposed at or above the action level or STEL were not identified, and the exposure was not accurately determined for each identified employee:  a.    On or about April 02, 2014,  employees, working at the Cow Foot Bath Area in the Parlor II, were exposed to formaldehyde and the employer had not conducted initial air monitoring to determine if employees' exposure levels were at or above the action level or Short Term Exposure Limit (STEL).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1048 N01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jun 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1290

29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program:   a.    On or about April 02, 2014, employees, working at the Cow Foot Bath Area in the Parlor II, were exposed to formaldehyde and had not participated in a training program that covered the information as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3)(i)-(vii).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2014
Abate by
Jul 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 186020852260H159R224

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a.    On or about March 10, 2014, the employer did not provide the information and training on the new label elements and the new Safety Data Sheet format to employees who had exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to Gladiator Barrier Base and Gladiator Barrier Activator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Alliance Dairies's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339622789.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.