Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: H.F. INTERIORS USA, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of H.F. INTERIORS USA, INC. in RED AND WHITE FLEET FERRY ZALOPHUS 2900 MAIN STREET, ALAMEDA, CA 94501 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 339623118.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H.F. Interiors USA, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H.F. Interiors USA, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
RED AND WHITE FLEET FERRY ZALOPHUS 2900 MAIN STREET
City
ALAMEDA
State
CA
ZIP
94501
Mailing
25350 MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY SUITE 310, VALENCIA, CA 91355
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use (Shipyard Employment 1915.154):   Onboard vessel ZALOPHUS, main deck: Employees were required to wear 3M 6300 dual cartridge respirators while installing insulation and the employer had not developed or implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace (Shipyard Employment 1915.154):   Onboard vessel ZALOPHUS: Employees were required to wear 3M 6300 dual cartridge respirators while insulating on the main deck and the employer had not provided a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested (Shipyard Employment 1915.154):  Onboard vessel ZALOPHUS, main deck: Employees were required to wear 3M 6300 dual cartridge respirators while installing insulation and the employer had not provided annual fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(5): Respiratory protection retraining was not conducted annually (Shipyard Employment 1915.154):   Onboard vessel ZALOPHUS, main deck: Employees were required to wear 3M 6300 dual cartridge respirators while installing insulation and the employer had not provided annual retraining.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.502 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.502(a): A written fire safety plan was not developed and implemented by the employer that covered all of the actions necessary to ensure the employees safety in the event of a fire:    Onboard vessel ZALOPHUS, main deck:  Employees were working onboard the vessel and the employer had not developed or implemented a written fire plan that covered all of actions necessary to ensure employees safety in the event of a fire.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339623118.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.