MIRAMAR BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: COASTA DRYWALL ESPECIALTI INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COASTA DRYWALL ESPECIALTI INC. in 65 PONCIANIA BLVD, MIRAMAR BEACH, FL 32550 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339630378.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COASTA DRYWALL ESPECIALTI INC.
- Site address
- 65 PONCIANIA BLVD
- City
- MIRAMAR BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32550
- Mailing
- 913 N BEAL PKWY, FORT WALTON BEACH, FL 32547
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about March 12, 2014, an employee was working underneath another employee without the use of a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a. On or about March 12, 2014, employees were using an aerial lift without the use of personal fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 31, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about March 12, 2014, an employee working near the edge was not protected from a 13 and a half feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339630378.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.