COLUMBUS GROVE, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: COLONIAL SURFACE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COLONIAL SURFACE SOLUTIONS, INC. in 4599 CAMPBELL RD., COLUMBUS GROVE, OH 45830 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339631897.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Colonial Surface Solutions, INC. for free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Colonial Surface Solutions, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COLONIAL SURFACE SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 4599 CAMPBELL RD.
- City
- COLUMBUS GROVE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45830
- Mailing
- 4599 CAMPBELL RD., COLUMBUS GROVE, OH 45830
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 42
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01 III
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(iii): The written program did not contain fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators: a) On or about March 14, 2014, them employer failed to ensure that the written respiratory protection program contained: fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.134 C01 VII
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(vii): The written program did not contain provisions for training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they were potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations: a) On or about March 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that the written respiratory protection program contained procedures for training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they were potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 IX
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ix): The written respiratory protection program did not contain procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program: a) On or about March 14, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that the written respiratory protection program contained procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH. a) on our about March 14, 2014, the employer failed to identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace, such as but not limited to TGIC; this evaluation should have include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form. Where the employer cannot identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer shall consider the atmosphere to be IDLH.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $1,050
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer may discontinue an employees medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. a) On or about March 14, 2014, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was required to use a half face respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1050
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT). a) On or about March 14, 2014, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) On or about March 14, 2014, the employer allowed respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by an employee who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 21, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a. On or about March 14, 2014 the employer did not ensure respirators were stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals and were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
Aug 11, 2026
Gold Coast Fence INC. · LONG BEACH, CA
Aug 10, 2026
J & G Brothers Rigging & Erecting LLC · MIAMI, FL
Aug 7, 2026
Skyline Scaffolding Group, INC. · JERSEY CITY, NJ
Aug 6, 2026
JMJ Asphalt Consultant LLC · BELLEVILLE, MI
Aug 6, 2026
WA317992412 - American Structures & Design INC · SUMNER, WA
More inspections in OH
Aug 11, 2026
Humanetics Innovative Solutions, INC. · HURON, OH
Aug 11, 2026
Anderson Heating and Cooling · WILLOUGHBY, OH
Aug 11, 2026
The Sherwin Williams Company · MASSILLON, OH
Aug 10, 2026
Ohio Valley Veneer, INC. · PIKETON, OH
Aug 10, 2026
Mechanical Dynamics & Analysis LLC · EUCLID, OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339631897.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.