Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STUCCO AND STONE WORK BY KEITH VINING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STUCCO AND STONE WORK BY KEITH VINING in 1485 S. 6TH ST, MACCLENNY, FL 32063 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339632325.

Watch Stucco AND Stone Work BY Keith Vining — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stucco AND Stone Work BY Keith Vining is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1485 S. 6TH ST
City
MACCLENNY
State
FL
ZIP
32063
Mailing
1498 ALPALACHEE PWY, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1440.00 · Current $1440.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.   On or about March 14, 2014 on the north side of a construction site, employees working beneath employees on a scaffold applying stucco to the structure were not wearing hard hats, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by falling debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1440

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.  a.      On or about March 14, 2014 on the north east side of a commercial structure, an employee applying stucco to the wall surface was using a scaffold that was not fully planked with an exposed opening of 16 inches, exposing himself to an 8 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4410.00 · Current $4410.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(v): Each employee on a walkway located within a scaffold was not protected by a guardrail system (with a minimum 200 pound toprail capacity) installed within 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) of and along at least one side of the walkway:  a.   On or about March 14, 2014 on the north side of a commercial structure, two employees applying stucco to the wall surface were using a scaffold that did not have guardrails, exposing employees to a 16 feet fall hazard.  b.   On or about March 14, 2014 on the north side of a commercial structure, an employee applying stucco to the wall surface was using a scaffold that did not have guardrails, exposing the employee to an 8 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4410

1926.451 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2): The employer did not have a competent person determine the feasibility and safety of providing fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds:  a.   On or about March 14, 2014 on a construction site, the employer did not ensure a competent person was on site when they erected a supported scaffold, exposing employees to fall hazards up to 16 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339632325.