Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: J. FRANK & ASSOCIATES LTD.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of J. FRANK & ASSOCIATES LTD. in WEINER DR. & BUTTERMAN CT., MONSEY, NY 10952 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 339635120.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J. Frank & Associates LTD. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J. Frank & Associates LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
WEINER DR. & BUTTERMAN CT.
City
MONSEY
State
NY
ZIP
10952
Mailing
24 WASHINGTON AVE., SPRING VALLEY, NY 10977
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors.    location: interior of building, lot 21-22  on or about: 03/13/14    a) Employees were using equipment, including a Makita sander, that were plugged into extension cords.  The employees were not provided with GFCI protection or an assured equipment grounding conductor program.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $700
  • · C (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:    location: 3rd floor, lot 21-22    a) Employees, installing the permanent stairrail and hallway banister, were not provided with any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of 10 1/2 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1000
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one hand rail:      location: stairs between 1st and 3rd floors, lot 21-22  on or about: 3/13/14      a) Employees, installing the permanent stairrail, were not provided with a temporary hand rail.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1000
  • · C (S) $2800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2014
Abate by
Apr 8, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  location: stairs between 1st and 3rd floors, lot 21-22 on or about: 3/13/14   a) Employeee were using the stairs to access the upper levels and were working from the stairs while installing the permanent stairrails. The open sided stairs were not provided with temporary stairrails.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2014
Abate by
Apr 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous:  location: interior of building, lot 21-22 on or about: 03/13/14  a) Employees were using a Makita sander. The sander was plugged into an extension cord that was missing the grounding pin.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339635120.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.