PORTER, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: TRYCO MACHINE WORKS, LTD.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRYCO MACHINE WORKS, LTD. in 23731 FM 1314, PORTER, TX 77365 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 339641896.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRYCO MACHINE WORKS, LTD.
- Site address
- 23731 FM 1314
- City
- PORTER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77365
- Mailing
- 23731 FM 1314, PORTER, TX 77365
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333511
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: The employer does not guard all machines whose operation exposes employees to injury. a. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the Fabrication Shop where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Cooen brand horizontal band saw without a blade guard. b. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #1, without a chuck guard. c. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #2, without a chuck guard. d. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #3, without a chuck guard. e. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #4, without a chuck guard. f. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #5, without a chuck guard. g. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #6, without a chuck guard. h. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Warner & Swasey brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #7, without a chuck guard. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure the hazardous areas on all machines are guarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.305 A02 I
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2014
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i): Temporary electrical power and lighting installation(s) 600 volts, nominal, or less were used in prohibited manners: The employer uses temporary electrical power in a prohibited manner. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, next to the quality control room where an extension cord and power strip was used as a permanent power source for permanent equipment. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure all flexible cords and cables are used in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.305.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333511)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339641896.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.