Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: TRYCO MACHINE WORKS, LTD.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRYCO MACHINE WORKS, LTD. in 23731 FM 1314, PORTER, TX 77365 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 339641896.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tryco Machine Works, LTD. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tryco Machine Works, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23731 FM 1314
City
PORTER
State
TX
ZIP
77365
Mailing
23731 FM 1314, PORTER, TX 77365
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333511
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:   The employer does not guard all machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.      a. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the Fabrication Shop where an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a Cooen brand horizontal band saw without a blade guard.      b. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #1, without a chuck guard.     c. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #2, without a chuck guard.     d. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #3, without a chuck guard.     e. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #4, without a chuck guard.     f. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #5, without a chuck guard.     g. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Kingston brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #6, without a chuck guard.      h. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, in the manual lathe area where an employee was exposed to a struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Warner & Swasey brand horizontal lathe, identified by the employer as lathe #7, without a chuck guard.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure the hazardous areas on all machines are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.305 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2014
Abate by
Apr 11, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i): Temporary electrical power and lighting installation(s) 600 volts, nominal, or less were used in prohibited manners:  The employer uses temporary electrical power in a prohibited manner. This violation occurred on or about March 20, 2014, next to the quality control room where an extension cord and power strip was used as a permanent power source for permanent equipment.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure all flexible cords and cables are used in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.305.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339641896.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.